Compare California vs Wyoming Paychecks
VSDetailed comparison of tax rates, cost of living, and quality of life
📌 Tax burden differs by approximately $9,975 annually at $75,000 (13.30% versus no income tax). Wyoming stays competitive via no income tax. Wyoming suits tech workers focused on take-home pay; California appeals to ranchers valuing cultural amenities.
Looking at the numbers, California's 13.30% rate versus Wyoming's no income tax means about $9,975 difference annually on $75,000. That's the kind of gap that gets people's attention, even if other factors ultimately drive the decision.
🔑 Key Differences
- **State income tax**: California at 13.30% vs Wyoming at no income tax
- **Annual savings** (on $75,000): Wyoming saves you ~$9,975
- **Tax system**: Both use progressive brackets
- **Deductions**: Standard federal deductions apply, state variations exist
- **Local taxes**: Check your specific county/city as rates vary within states
Tax Comparison
| Tax Type | California | Wyoming |
|---|---|---|
| State Income Tax | 1% - 13.3% | No Income Tax Winner |
| 💰 On $40,000 Salary |
State Tax: $2,860
Take Home: $37,140
|
State Tax: $0
Take Home: $40,000
+$2,860
|
| 💰 On $60,000 Salary |
State Tax: $4,290
Take Home: $55,710
|
State Tax: $0
Take Home: $60,000
+$4,290
|
| 💰 On $100,000 Salary |
State Tax: $7,150
Take Home: $92,850
|
State Tax: $0
Take Home: $100,000
+$7,150
|
| Cost of Living | California ranks among America's most expensive states. The Bay Area and coastal Southern California command extreme housing costs - median home prices often exceed $800,000, with desirable areas surpassing $1 million. Monthly rent for modest apartments frequently runs $2,500-4,000 in major metros. Central Valley cities like Fresno and Bakersfield offer better value but with fewer high-paying employment opportunities. Beyond housing, gas prices run $1-2 above national averages, groceries cost more, and dining out impacts budgets heavily. Even six-figure salaries require careful budgeting in expensive metro areas. | Wyoming offers exceptional affordability throughout most areas. Jackson commands premium prices driven by wealthy residents and tourism. Cheyenne, Casper, and other cities maintain housing costs dramatically below national averages - quality homes often sell for $200,000-350,000. Property taxes stay low. Sales tax reaches 5-6%. The extreme affordability combined with no income tax means moderate salaries provide comfortable lifestyles for those accepting harsh winters and remote locations. |
Pros & Cons
California
✓ Advantages
- Strong job market with high salaries in tech and entertainment
- Year-round mild climate in coastal areas
- World-class universities and research institutions
- Diverse cultural opportunities and amenities
- Strong employee protections and benefits
⚠ Considerations
- Highest state income tax in the nation (up to 13.3%)
- Extremely high housing costs in desirable areas
- High sales tax and gas prices
- Significant traffic congestion in major metros
- High cost of living across most categories
Wyoming
✓ Advantages
- No state income tax
- No state estate or inheritance tax
- Low cost of living in most areas
- Beautiful natural scenery and outdoor recreation
- Strong energy and natural resources sector
⚠ Considerations
- Very cold winters with harsh weather
- Limited job market outside energy sector
- Small population and remote locations
- Limited healthcare and education options in some areas
- Economic volatility tied to energy prices
Bottom Line
Wyoming saves you roughly $9,975 annually at $75,000, which adds up over time. California keeps drawing people despite the tax premium, largely due to no income tax. You'll find tech workers gravitating toward Wyoming, while ranchers often decide California's advantages justify the cost.📢 Share This Comparison
Help others make informed decisions about their paycheck