Minnesota vs Wyoming: Tax Impact on Your Salary
VSDetailed comparison of tax rates, cost of living, and quality of life
📌 Minnesota's 9.85% rate compared with Wyoming's no income tax translates to $9,850 difference annually for $100,000 professionals. Wyoming compensates with no income tax. corporate workers demographics lean Wyoming, but ranchers sectors find Minnesota attractive despite higher tax burden.
The tax picture between Minnesota and Wyoming breaks down like this: 9.85% versus no income tax. For someone making $100,000, we're talking about $9,850 in annual difference. That's significant, but it's worth looking at what else each state brings to the table.
🔑 Key Differences
- **State income tax**: Minnesota at 9.85% vs Wyoming at no income tax
- **Annual savings** (on $100,000): Wyoming saves you ~$9,850
- **Tax system**: Both use progressive brackets
- **Deductions**: Standard federal deductions apply, state variations exist
- **Local taxes**: Check your specific county/city as rates vary within states
Tax Comparison
| Tax Type | Minnesota | Wyoming |
|---|---|---|
| State Income Tax | 5.35% - 9.85% | No Income Tax Winner |
| 💰 On $40,000 Salary |
State Tax: $3,040
Take Home: $36,960
|
State Tax: $0
Take Home: $40,000
+$3,040
|
| 💰 On $60,000 Salary |
State Tax: $4,560
Take Home: $55,440
|
State Tax: $0
Take Home: $60,000
+$4,560
|
| 💰 On $100,000 Salary |
State Tax: $7,600
Take Home: $92,400
|
State Tax: $0
Take Home: $100,000
+$7,600
|
| Cost of Living | Minnesota offers moderate living costs that help offset higher taxes. Minneapolis-St. Paul provides metropolitan amenities with housing prices well below coastal markets - quality homes in good suburbs often sell for $300,000-400,000. Rochester and Duluth offer better value. Property taxes can be substantial, funding strong schools and services. Heating costs run high during severe winters. Groceries and services cost near national averages. Despite high state taxes, your net income typically provides comfortable lifestyle thanks to moderate housing costs and excellent public services that reduce other expenses. | Wyoming offers exceptional affordability throughout most areas. Jackson commands premium prices driven by wealthy residents and tourism. Cheyenne, Casper, and other cities maintain housing costs dramatically below national averages - quality homes often sell for $200,000-350,000. Property taxes stay low. Sales tax reaches 5-6%. The extreme affordability combined with no income tax means moderate salaries provide comfortable lifestyles for those accepting harsh winters and remote locations. |
Pros & Cons
Minnesota
✓ Advantages
- Strong job market in healthcare, retail, and technology
- Excellent quality of life and education
- Good public services funded by higher taxes
- Minneapolis-St. Paul offers urban amenities
- Strong sense of community
⚠ Considerations
- High state income tax (up to 9.85%)
- Very cold winters with heavy snow
- Higher cost of living than some neighboring states
- Property taxes can be substantial
- Sales tax reaches 7-8% in many areas
Wyoming
✓ Advantages
- No state income tax
- No state estate or inheritance tax
- Low cost of living in most areas
- Beautiful natural scenery and outdoor recreation
- Strong energy and natural resources sector
⚠ Considerations
- Very cold winters with harsh weather
- Limited job market outside energy sector
- Small population and remote locations
- Limited healthcare and education options in some areas
- Economic volatility tied to energy prices
Bottom Line
Wyoming's no income tax versus Minnesota's 9.85% translates to roughly $9,850 advantage at $100,000. Minnesota stays relevant by offering no income tax. The decision often hinges on whether {factor} or direct tax savings carries more weight in your situation.📢 Share This Comparison
Help others make informed decisions about their paycheck