Oregon vs Wyoming Take-Home Pay Showdown
VSDetailed comparison of tax rates, cost of living, and quality of life
π 9.90% in Oregon versus no income tax in Wyoming translates to about $8,415 per year at $85,000. Wyoming balances this through no income tax. Recent data shows lifestyle seekers migrating to Wyoming, ranchers to Oregon based on broader considerations.
Between Oregon's 9.90% and Wyoming's no income tax, the tax differential hits around $8,415 yearly at $85,000. That's real money in anyone's book, even if the decision ultimately comes down to more than just tax policy.
π Key Differences
- **State income tax**: Oregon at 9.90% vs Wyoming at no income tax
- **Annual savings** (on $85,000): Wyoming saves you ~$8,415
- **Tax system**: Both use progressive brackets
- **Deductions**: Standard federal deductions apply, state variations exist
- **Local taxes**: Check your specific county/city as rates vary within states
Tax Comparison
| Tax Type | Oregon | Wyoming |
|---|---|---|
| State Income Tax | 4.75% - 9.9% | No Income Tax Winner |
| π° On $40,000 Salary |
State Tax: $2,930
Take Home: $37,070
|
State Tax: $0
Take Home: $40,000
+$2,930
|
| π° On $60,000 Salary |
State Tax: $4,395
Take Home: $55,605
|
State Tax: $0
Take Home: $60,000
+$4,395
|
| π° On $100,000 Salary |
State Tax: $7,325
Take Home: $92,675
|
State Tax: $0
Take Home: $100,000
+$7,325
|
| Cost of Living | Oregon costs vary significantly by region. Portland housing has appreciated substantially - median prices often exceed $500,000 in desirable areas. Eugene offers better value. Bend commands premium pricing given outdoor recreation appeal. Rural Oregon provides genuine affordability. Property taxes stay moderate. No sales tax delivers meaningful savings - no tax on groceries, clothing, electronics, or any retail purchases. Healthcare costs run high. Overall, Portland requires substantial income for comfortable living while smaller cities remain more accessible. | Wyoming offers exceptional affordability throughout most areas. Jackson commands premium prices driven by wealthy residents and tourism. Cheyenne, Casper, and other cities maintain housing costs dramatically below national averages - quality homes often sell for $200,000-350,000. Property taxes stay low. Sales tax reaches 5-6%. The extreme affordability combined with no income tax means moderate salaries provide comfortable lifestyles for those accepting harsh winters and remote locations. |
Pros & Cons
Oregon
β Advantages
- No sales tax saves money on purchases
- Beautiful natural scenery and outdoor recreation
- Strong technology and manufacturing sectors
- Portland offers urban culture and amenities
- Good quality of life
β Considerations
- High state income tax (up to 9.9%)
- High cost of living especially in Portland
- Rainy weather much of the year
- Property taxes substantial
- Housing costs risen significantly
Wyoming
β Advantages
- No state income tax
- No state estate or inheritance tax
- Low cost of living in most areas
- Beautiful natural scenery and outdoor recreation
- Strong energy and natural resources sector
β Considerations
- Very cold winters with harsh weather
- Limited job market outside energy sector
- Small population and remote locations
- Limited healthcare and education options in some areas
- Economic volatility tied to energy prices
Bottom Line
Looking strictly at taxes, Wyoming provides $8,415 yearly advantage for $85,000 professionals. Oregon balances this through no income tax. Your best choice depends on weighing that direct savings against what Oregon offers in terms of {factor} and overall quality of life.π’ Share This Comparison
Help others make informed decisions about their paycheck