Utah vs Wyoming Take-Home Pay Showdown
VSDetailed comparison of tax rates, cost of living, and quality of life
📌 The 4.85% versus no income tax comparison nets approximately $4,123 annually for $85,000 professionals. Wyoming stays relevant through no income tax. Migration patterns reflect active families choosing Wyoming, ranchers selecting Utah based on total value rather than taxes alone.
Tax rates tell an interesting story when comparing Utah and Wyoming: 4.85% versus no income tax. Someone earning $85,000 sees about $4,123 annual variance. Whether that tips the scales depends on how much weight you give to take-home pay versus other factors.
🔑 Key Differences
- **State income tax**: Utah at 4.85% vs Wyoming at no income tax
- **Annual savings** (on $85,000): Wyoming saves you ~$4,123
- **Tax system**: Both use progressive brackets
- **Deductions**: Standard federal deductions apply, state variations exist
- **Local taxes**: Check your specific county/city as rates vary within states
Tax Comparison
| Tax Type | Utah | Wyoming |
|---|---|---|
| State Income Tax | 4.85% | No Income Tax Winner |
| 💰 On $40,000 Salary |
State Tax: $1,940
Take Home: $38,060
|
State Tax: $0
Take Home: $40,000
+$1,940
|
| 💰 On $60,000 Salary |
State Tax: $2,910
Take Home: $57,090
|
State Tax: $0
Take Home: $60,000
+$2,910
|
| 💰 On $100,000 Salary |
State Tax: $4,850
Take Home: $95,150
|
State Tax: $0
Take Home: $100,000
+$4,850
|
| Cost of Living | Utah costs have increased substantially. Salt Lake City and surrounding areas command prices approaching expensive metros - median home prices often exceed $450,000-500,000. Provo-Orem follows similar trajectory. Smaller Utah cities offer better value. Property taxes stay moderate. Sales tax reaches 7-8%. The affordability advantage Utah once offered has compressed significantly as technology sector drives population growth and housing demand. | Wyoming offers exceptional affordability throughout most areas. Jackson commands premium prices driven by wealthy residents and tourism. Cheyenne, Casper, and other cities maintain housing costs dramatically below national averages - quality homes often sell for $200,000-350,000. Property taxes stay low. Sales tax reaches 5-6%. The extreme affordability combined with no income tax means moderate salaries provide comfortable lifestyles for those accepting harsh winters and remote locations. |
Pros & Cons
Utah
✓ Advantages
- Flat 4.65% income tax is simple and predictable
- Strong growing technology sector
- Beautiful outdoor recreation and skiing
- Lower unemployment rates
- Young educated workforce
⚠ Considerations
- Rising housing costs especially in Salt Lake area
- Air quality issues in winter months
- Limited public transportation
- Sales tax can be high
- Some areas face water scarcity
Wyoming
✓ Advantages
- No state income tax
- No state estate or inheritance tax
- Low cost of living in most areas
- Beautiful natural scenery and outdoor recreation
- Strong energy and natural resources sector
⚠ Considerations
- Very cold winters with harsh weather
- Limited job market outside energy sector
- Small population and remote locations
- Limited healthcare and education options in some areas
- Economic volatility tied to energy prices
Bottom Line
Bottom line: Wyoming saves you about $4,123 annually at $85,000 on taxes alone. Utah maintains appeal through no income tax, attracting people willing to pay more for what it offers. The choice often comes down to {factor} versus direct financial savings.📢 Share This Comparison
Help others make informed decisions about their paycheck